In mythology,
during the Trojan war, ancient Rome was celebrating the retreat of the Greek army. In their haste to withdraw, they had left statues bearing the likeness of
Trojan horses, which the Romans accepted as gifts. Believing in the spoils of
war, they were now rightfully theirs, and they moved them inside the walls of the
city and began to celebrate their apparent success. Unbeknownst to them, inside
the statues were members of the Greek army who then attacked and destroyed the
Roman army. That is a lesson that is played over and over again throughout history.
"Beware Greeks bearing gifts"
With that as a
backdrop, it is becoming increasingly likely that a similar situation occurred
in Columbus during this current budgetary debate. Sadly, if it turns out to be
true, it will end up hurting societies must vulnerable and defenseless
citizens.
Not long ago,
Governor John Kasich was lauded with his ambitious plan to expand Medicaid by 500 million dollars in this upcoming budget.
Many people that I know in the mental health sector were ecstatic with the news
that scarce dollars available for treatment were finally going to be increased, and perhaps, the
downward spiral of the entire system would be reversed. It was a proposal that
would have restored dignity to groups of people who have been sick and down and
out for many years, and at the same time, save lives. I personally knew
families who were literally brought to tears of joy over this and all expressed
enormous gratitude for this change. Well, almost everybody, as I thought of the
old saying, beware of Greeks bearing gifts!
Immediately, I
became skeptical of the true intentions of this proposal, but hoped that I was
wrong. However, based on the historical ignorance of the leaders of the Ohio Statehouse,
I knew that another old saying could be valid. "If it seems too good to be true, it most likely is!" It
did not last long for my skepticism to become a crystal clear prophecy.
First off, lurking
in Columbus like hungry piranha's, is Speaker of the House Bill Batchelder,
State Senate Leader Keith Faber and
their personal cast of degenerates. These are groups of people who will rail
against what they consider wasteful programs that help people, and at the same
time, provide tax breaks for those that are wealthy, or in specific fraternal
organizations. All seem to possess a hidden agenda to harm those who are not
part of their hedonistic social network.
Predictably, as
the budget moves out of the House into the Senate, Batchelder pulled out his
scalpel and took out that expansion, and then indulged himself with self praise.
In a recent article, he proclaimed,
"Budget passed by (the) house is a step in the right direction." He
is actually proud that along with proteges like State Representative Nan Baker
of Westlake, they have metaphorically slit the throats of many people in
desperate need of help. Even more disconcerting is that they seemed to find joy
and satisfaction in this accomplishment. In reality, their past actions have
damaged the lives of people being punished for just getting sick.
I attempted to get
a response from Speaker Batchelders office about his budget, and all I received
was the usual, "we will get back to you", which has become his trademark
response when the public demands clarity. It is becoming widespread agreement
that transparency and integrity are not two of his strong talking points. He mentioned in that same story
that they are dealing with the results of poor budgetary decisions in the past.
Revisionism aside, he neglects to mention that many of those decisions were
made by him!
I contacted Nan
Baker's office with a question; why she
was more than willing to cut off funding to those most in need while allowing
tax cuts that will enrich her family business? Like Batchelder, she hides
behind a wall of secrecy and personal hatred of those deemed unworthy of her
attention. However, I am convinced that the local Chamber of Commerce will award
her another plaque of honor for her work providing its members with additional
corporate welfare. With the next teenage suicide, she and Batchelder can also
add another notch on their gun barrels.
Which now brings
us the Ohio Senate and awaiting the likes of State Senator Keith Faber. In a
recent conversation, his staff member defended taking that expansion out of the
budget. He said mental health funding "should be discussed outside the
context of the state budget." He indicated that this discussion will take
place at a later date. Hopefully, this will occur prior to the next
resurrection, but I am not holding my breath, as these types of discussions
rarely, if ever occur.
Again, when the history
of Faber is examined, an ominous trend unfolds, so there is not an massive deal
of hope for anything positive. This is a person who once proposed placing violent
sex offenders in mental hospitals. Somehow, he equates a woman with post-partum
depression, with that of a child molester or a serial rapist. He is living
proof that a keen intellect is not a requirement to hold public office.
Now comes the difficult part, and that is, did
Governor Kasich propose this plan, giving people hope, gaining an significant wealth
of publicity, knowing that it stood little chance of getting past the hatchet
wielded by Speaker Batchelder? To paraphrase a famous question, "What did the
Governor know, and when did he know it?"
The evidence,
though little empirical, does cast doubt on Kasich's intentions. He has been
close to Representative Batchelder for many years and knows his true motives.
In fact, it was Mr. Batchelder who, many years ago, introduced me to John
Kasich. With that in mind, and Nan Bakers hatred, whom Governor Kasich
supported, it points to this bill being proposed strictly for positive press,
rather than for anything worthwhile and genuine. Once again, I do want to be proven wrong, but
that does not appear to be a likely outcome.
After several
attempts, I did finally reach a subordinate of Governor Kasich. He defended the
Governor wholeheartedly and said repeatedly that no one had worked harder and
more openly on this issue than Mr. Kasich. He did not respond when I challenged
him on their unequivocal support of Baker and Batchelder, who have become
roadblocks to any significant positive expansion in the mental health field. Another
old saying, "Show me whom you are with, and I will tell you who you are!"
With this budget now in the Senate, it is
still possible for that growth to be reinstated, but, after my conversation
with Senator Faber's office, the chances of that are severely diminished.
However, with an army of advocates still pushing forward, a possibility for
some compromise is still on the table.
It is essential to
add that State Senator Shirley Smith, a Democrat out of Cleveland, has made a proposal
to restore those cuts. I hope she succeeds, but in a Republican controlled
house and Senate, she will be seriously outgunned. Also to her credit, she has
done marvelous work with mental health issues in the past so I would not write
her efforts off just yet.
As far as Governor
Kasich is concerned, let us now witness how many resources he puts forward to convince the
people he helped put in office that this program is needed. Let us see if he
tells the likes of Nan Baker's that he will support her opposition if she
continues to harm the ones that are in dire need of help. However, that is
about as likely as a return call from Speaker Batchelders office.
To formulate a possible
epitaph on this proposal, I need to point out that one of the dynamics of those
afflicted with mental illness is that it affects everyone connected with that
person. It tears loved ones to shreds as they conduct a seemingly helpless campaign
for treatment. So often, the resources needed have never been provided, and the
families suffer an subsequent tragedy. One of the few things that sustains
people dealing with a mentally ill loved one is hope. Many times that are all
they have to bolsters their lives, and in time that can be dashed. If this
proposal of Governor Kasich turns out to be nothing more than false hope, that
is an unforgivable sin. However, with all the people mentioned in this article
sleeping well at night knowing the damage they have done to people's lives, I
am not sure any of them will sincerely care.
Once again, I do
hope Governor Kasich proves me wrong!
It is no secret that about one out of five Americans suffer the indignities of having a mental illness, and I am one of those with that diagnosis.
ReplyDelete---------------------------------------------
Wow... finally admitting that liberalism is a disease? Sounds like you have a very serious case of it. I'm sorry...
Thank you for your misdiagnosis.
ReplyDeleteThe first time I voted was in 1976 in the republican Primary and it was for Reagan. In fact, eight years later I worked on his re-election campaign and am still a registered republican. Let you in on another secret, I liked George W. Bush.
To your ridiculous statements, I advise you to heed the words of Mark Twian. "It is better to have people only think you are stupid, then to open your mouth and remove all doubt".
Misdiagnosis? When I hear moonbat remarks about: " These are groups of people who will rail against what they consider wasteful programs that help people, and at the same time, provide tax breaks for those that are wealthy" or "...cut off funding to those most in need while allowing tax cuts that will enrich her family business? ", it sure sounds like another liberal whining... And I was a democrat from the first time I voted up to the Clinton years... so what's your point? You can claim to be a republican but your writing (at least in this post) proves otherwise.
ReplyDeleteMoonbats? Name calling? Not worth responding.
DeleteSo you want to explain this whole "Beware Greeks bearing gifts" idea that you tried to push? Are you saying Kasish wanted to get a foot in Medicaid so he could get rid of it? I think what you really meant was Kasich was being a --- forget my politically incorrectness.... an Indian giver.
ReplyDeleteDoesn't it make you look silly when Kasich came out and said that if it doesn't pass it should be put on the ballot?
I'm oppossed to the Medicaid Expansion... Just more tax increases down the road I'm going to have to pay for....
To begin with, I am questioning his motives and still do. I do not look silly as placing this issue on the ballot will be an initiative created by many mental health advocates across the state, and not the current members of the statehouse.
DeleteAlso, you are foolish to believe that do not already pay for this. Instead of getting help in an outpatient situation, people get help in the prison system which is much more expensive then what is being proposed. In essence, it will save you tax money. However, do not let facts stand in the way of cheap rhetoric.
thank you for this beautiful article,it's realy very usefull.
ReplyDelete=================================================
chiropractic care
Thank you for sharing. After preparing a lecture for your event, it’s always in good taste to send a thank you with professional, quality speaker gifts!
ReplyDelete