As we close the
door on the recent Presidential election, many commentators and political
pundits will spend an inordinate amount of time analyzing how and why it ended
the way it did. Many will point to “defining” moments and such, while ignoring
other pertinent details. However, there was something that exemplified a double
standard in the national media, half of which was exploited, while the most
damaging aspect was ignored.
Back in October,
Conservative personality Ann Coulter raised the ire of mainstream media by
calling The President a “retard”. The outcry was predictable, as she was deemed
hateful, ignorant, and those were among the kindest descriptions. Though it was
a poor choice of words, she never once used this term to demean a group of people in
a discriminatory fashion. She, in fact, directed it at one single person. Additionally, I have heard harsher and more offensive words used on the national
setting against Mitt Romney and Ann Coulter herself. However, that is a
discussion for another time.
What the public
should find disturbing is the phony outrage that many members of the political left
have when it comes to their selective condemnation, while ignoring their own
hatred, and personal bias. A good example would be President Obama’s acceptance
of exclusion of a particular segment of society, which was rooted with his
comments largely ignored by the national media. During one of the debates, the discussion
predictably turned to gun control. President Obama said, “We have to…make sure that we’re keeping guns out of the hands of
criminals, those who are mentally
ill.” This degrading comment is one that ignores the knowledge that those
with mental illness are not more violent than the rest of society, but are more
likely to be victims of criminal acts. More importantly, this was not just
calling someone a name; it dehumanized and diminished over fifty million people
who suffer one of these disorders.
My question to the
people who demonized Ann Coulter is straightforward; why no outrage at these
comments from the President? He, against all evidence to the contrary,
categorized a diverse group of people with violent felons. According to him, a
woman with post-partum depression is comparable to a violent individual who
robbed, assaulted or even killed another. Add to it the soldiers coming home as heroes
fighting wars, who suffer PTSD and in many cases will be given a lifetime
sentence of treatment for mental health issues. Are they also to be categorized
with the violent criminals?
If that is not
enough evidence that these comments are a form of bigotry, how about adding to
the mix, the challenges facing the local police. These first responders endure
the daily threat of “Vicarious Trauma”, which is witnessing traumatic events on
a daily basis over the course of time. With that, mental health issues come to
light after many years of dealing with some of life’s most extraordinary
tragedies. Since this can and does trigger some form of mental illness, are
they now part of President Obama’s sub-culture that is categorized with violent
criminals? Sadly, this issue is being met with the media’s self-imposed censorship.
One person who did
speak through the silence was a former Washington Post writer and mental health
advocate, Pete Earley. This man, who authored the book, “Crazy, a Fathers
Search Through America’s Mental Health Madness”, was one of the few critics of
the Presidents repugnant comments. He brought up an intriguing correlation.
Imagine the outcry from the left if we substituted the words mentally ill with,
Blacks, Hispanics or Gays. Many of the same groups that condemned Ann Coulter
would be up in arms against anyone who would demean these minority groups. However,
the left identifies only selective bias!
Instead of outrage
from the side of “Inclusion” we discover deafening silence and sadly, this adds
to the acceptance of intolerance of those with one of these conditions. No one
from MSNBC, who is constantly railing against the so-called hatred of the
conservative’s, ever said a word, except to anoint Obama as the savior of
western civilization. Why did these people refuse to at least question this
President’s need to humiliate people because of an illness? Here again, it
appears that they practice nothing more than acceptable desecration.
To enlighten
people, let me introduce everyone to those that belong to this subculture of
the mentally ill. They are your friends, your neighbors, loved ones, and yes,
they are soldiers that are returning from war. Add to them teachers, police
officers, firemen, writers, and yes, even Presidents of the United States! This
“fraternities” membership is like everyone else; they wake up, work hard, and
try and live a happy life. Since this President has shown disdain and
ignorance, he should walk down any street and count four houses, because in one
of them, there will be a family directly impacted by someone close who is
battling a mental health affliction. People in this group have struggles that
only members of this minority class and their loved ones can fully understand. When
these individuals fall, it is their close circles of friends that are there to
find help for them as they struggle to locate treatment.
The left is always
screaming diversity; well I have a lesson for them. The members of this fraternity
are the most diverse congregation ever created. These diseases attack with
relentless abandonment to every group. They are prevalent in Whites, Blacks,
Hispanics, Asians, Christians,Muslims, Jewish, Atheists, Conservatives and even Liberals! The
diseases are non-discriminatory in nature, and they do not even differentiate
the social economic standing of its targets.
Not surprisingly, we
do not hear a vast deal of the positive contributions to society by those with
mental illness. Many accomplish a great
deal, but most good work usually goes unrecognized. However, when tragedy
strikes, that opens the door for some exploitation that does nothing but undermine
the opportunities people have for acceptance.
In Aurora, Colorado
and Tucson, Arizona, mass killings took place by two individuals who suffer from
severe mental illness. However, rather than examining the cause and finding a
solution, the left once again, used it as an opportunity to utilize the “fictitious hate” of conservative
groups. The Tea Party and Sarah Palin are always the two main targets for the
left’s rant. Surprisingly, Ann Coulter was not blamed in these tragedies, but I
am certain someone will now find a way to add some culpability on her part.
What was ignored
in those tragedies, specifically Tucson, is that our failing mental health
system with archaic laws and ever diminishing readily available treatment are
the main culprit. Not surprisingly, no one on the federal level has done anything
significant to modernize these laws or open the door for better treatment. Yet,
President Obama who was quick to condemn this segment of the population, has
done nothing in correcting this form of discrimination. Based on his comments,
it appears that he accepts this kind of bigotry, and is willing to sacrifice
those vulnerable people for political gain, as members of the political left
cheered his hateful comments.
To be fair, no one
on the right side of the political spectrum spoke out against these deplorable
comments. Conversely, not one of the liberal commentators defended people with
mental illness, but they sure were ready to attack Ann Coulter for an ill
advised name calling incident.
For many years
now, advocates across the country have worked tirelessly to promote awareness
that people with mental illness are not violent, or drains on society. This
advocacy has and continues to be an uphill climb. With this acceptance by the
national media of the Presidents discriminatory comments, that dream of inclusion
will become just that much more challenging, and for some people, it may become
impossible. In the meantime, people on the left should refrain from their phony
outrage, because their silence on these comments, suggest that they are the
true bigots. After all, while you were pointing your finger at Ann Coulter, how
many were left pointing back at yourselves?
I truly believe that in almost all instances it isn't maliciousness or insensitivity that makes it difficult for people to empathize with those who feel suicidal or with the people who have committed suicide. It's simply a lack of understanding of what it's like to be so severely depressed that you are driven to it. I hope this post helps.
ReplyDeleteHello, I enjoy reading all of your article.
ReplyDeleteI wanted to write a little comment to support
you.
Feel free to visit my web site :: bipolar treatment
Hey very nice blog!
ReplyDeleteHere is my web-site ... psychotherapies; ,
It's a pity you don't have a donate button! I'd most certainly donate to this outstanding blog!
ReplyDeleteI suppose for now i'll settle for book-marking and adding your
RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will share this website with my Facebook group.
Chat soon!
my site - psychotherapy notes
Hurrah, that's what I was looking for, what a stuff!
ReplyDeletepresent here at this webpage, thanks admin of this website.
Also visit my web page - definition of psychotherapy
of course like your website but you need to test the spelling on quite a few of your posts.
ReplyDeleteA number of them are rife with spelling problems and
I in finding it very troublesome to tell the reality nevertheless
I will certainly come again again.
Look at my homepage :: best web hosting site